The former advanced socialism allowed to own property, immediately had problems connected with it. Legislation is not too suited to the presence of the citizens even movable property, clearly was not up to par, which allowed fraudsters to actively apply a variety of ways oblaposhivaniya - far more than was invented in his time Ostap Bender. The most unpleasant ways to "weaning property" refers to the property.
It would seem that the general downturn in the property market due to the crisis would be to alleviate the situation - because if the goods are no longer in demand, the less scammers want them to take possession. However, the real estate the rule clearly does not apply. At the end of August this year, the head of the Moscow SU UPC Anatoly Bagmet said: "The great concern is the fact that the number of murders for which there is missing in Moscow
Greatest risk are single people and pensioners. And loneliness can mean just a room in an apartment or house without family members, rather than their complete absence. And the older single person, the greater the danger he faces. Especially if he lives in a nice apartment.
One of the most disturbing trends in modern society is that older people who own real estate, now can not fully trust even their relatives. Not uncommon for those very same "missing of the killing and relocation to mental institutions after completing your dedication to an apartment or a contract of social rents.
Comes to the fact that some lawyers have advised pensioners: "If you want to live, do not sign a social rent!". And it is not uncommon, when such advice is given, even if it comes to the conclusion of the contract of social rent to relatives.
If we consider the phenomenon of social rent, simply, the essence of it is stipulated that a certain property (this may not necessarily real estate) goes to someone who has certain obligations under the contract. Typically, the list of these obligations includes care for the property owner (usually the social rent are interested seniors), delivering food, medicine, miscellaneous services (not too much, by the way, burdensome). Often, the obligation is to pay a certain amount each month - maintenance allowance, pension because you can not be called too high and provide a decent standard of living.
In the case where a potential heir to the property under a contract of social rent is the man to put it mildly, dishonest, at best, are not fulfilled the conditions stipulated in the agreement. At worst ... increasing statistics of missing people who have had a certain property (real estate).
Happens is that the first terms of the contract are observed even with the over-fulfillment "plan". And then, after a few months - quite suddenly - a pensioner dies and the heir, lamenting the loss, bequeathed property receives. It turns out that you can challenge the social contract of rent, and "heir" will remain, as they say, at the peak the interest - if it is proven non-contract terms. But this - the court, witnesses, etc. As witnesses usually speak neighbors testator, the former owner of the property. The lawsuit was filed usually close relatives, who, it turns out, had no idea that her grandmother, aunt or uncle of a bad situation. " But if the neighbors honestly report that my eyes have seen as the heir lugging huge bags of food, ran to the pharmacy for drugs, and going on a visit to the retiree, they are often seen heir, the old man or old woman cooking dinner, here the court's decision unequivocally.
One problem - in many cases, doubts gnaw at: and so it really was a natural death of the pensioner, which anxiously concerned with the future heir to the social contract of rent? Maybe "good soul" simply poopasalas - and will not live that way if the old man to 100 years, so it does happen in good health and proper care.
But not necessarily be a pensioner to be at risk of sudden and unnatural death due to real estate. Enough to be just a lonely man, who was at once is not enough. These people also increase the statistics of missing persons. And after a loss suddenly becomes clear that real estate are owned by this lonely man, sold a certain Mr A or B through some real estate companies. And then bequeathed - but with the will is not as easy as with the sale. After missing person is not immediately recognized by the deceased, takes time, and then more time is required for entry into the law of inheritance. With the sale of all elementary: one sold, the second bought a signature stamp.
It turns out that lonely people was simply dangerous to stay alone. You must either maintain good relations with relatives, or become public man - a lot of friends, guests, etc. To not so easy to get close to fraudsters from the real estate. And not just the fraudsters, but very real gangsters.
And, of course, a variant with unscrupulous realtors also not excluded. Anatoly Bagmet said: "Criminal cases in 27 ... the facts. Typically, these killings are directly related to real estate to victims who turned to unscrupulous realtors. That is, people turned to the realtor in order to exchange a large apartment to a smaller - and in the content of living space savings, and remove the need less, and how many one person needs and additional payment is promised is pretty massive. And here's the lurking ambush - an unscrupulous realtor. Why look for an apartment to share, why pay extra money when you can - to pick up. True, it needs to kill, but ... human life is surprisingly fell compared with the real estate.
Particularly at risk are residents of large cities, megacities. Moscow St. Petersburg
No comments:
Post a Comment