Today I will talk about what criteria we can define a knowledgeable lawyer, because in this profession, unfortunately, met a lot of "random" people. I must admit that at present the market of legal services in develops spontaneously, and there are many firms and legal practices, promising in the short term to solve all your problems. And as in civil and arbitration law legal services can have virtually any person, sole proprietorship or organization, to understand the variety of proposals is really easy. If your question lies in the criminal justice process, it is wise to seek legal counsel only on the recommendations of friends - the chance of running into a charlatan is too large, especially in big cities. I still am a supporter of what everyone should do his job: teacher - to teach the pilots - to fly and so on. No doubt, everyone can benefit from legal advice from the internet or blogs comfortable to write your own claim, but it's better not to do so, as the area law is complex and requires a professional approach. Court - a kind of confrontation, in which you are against people who know and understand the law. So if you have a problem that requires intervention of a professional lawyer , I advise you to still spend time and talk to various professionals in order to decide who is best suited to you. To do this face to face with my esteemed colleagues, after a brief exposition of the problem take a look at some moments.
Thus, an experienced lawyer at the first meeting:
1. Will tell you exactly which documents he will need to solve your problem.
2. Are detailed plan of the work, outlining in detail what, why and in what order he would do.
3. Inform about the value of their services at every stage and tell you how much stamp duty will be to appeal to the court.
4. Take an advance payment for their work, said no to your proposal to get his fee only "after the end of the case."
5. Readily talk about their experiences in similar cases.
6. Will not promise a hundred percent guarantee of winning the case, will not rely on familiarity with the judges, Barack Obama, as well as other responsible persons at the same time call the relevant articles of the laws of your case and determine the likelihood of a successful outcome.
7. Clearly and express their thoughts correctly building its speech will not be evasive answer your questions ("so right", "everybody does it", etc.)
8. Tries all possible ways to resolve the issue in the pretrial order.
The list can continue, but in any case, after the communication, at an intuitive level, you should have confidence in this specialist . If the trust does not arise, treat, definitely not worth it.
Thus, an experienced lawyer at the first meeting:
1. Will tell you exactly which documents he will need to solve your problem.
2. Are detailed plan of the work, outlining in detail what, why and in what order he would do.
3. Inform about the value of their services at every stage and tell you how much stamp duty will be to appeal to the court.
4. Take an advance payment for their work, said no to your proposal to get his fee only "after the end of the case."
5. Readily talk about their experiences in similar cases.
6. Will not promise a hundred percent guarantee of winning the case, will not rely on familiarity with the judges, Barack Obama, as well as other responsible persons at the same time call the relevant articles of the laws of your case and determine the likelihood of a successful outcome.
7. Clearly and express their thoughts correctly building its speech will not be evasive answer your questions ("so right", "everybody does it", etc.)
8. Tries all possible ways to resolve the issue in the pretrial order.
The list can continue, but in any case, after the communication, at an intuitive level, you should have confidence in this specialist . If the trust does not arise, treat, definitely not worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment